Page 31 - 2516_21_June_ISLA_Market_Report_-_June_2021_-_final
P. 31

30                                                                                                      31

 Securities Lending Market Report | June 2021



















 As at the 30th June collateral held with European triparty   experienced price volatility. As markets have returned to a
 agents was very much in line with previous historical norms   period of more relative stability in the past six months the
 with equites and government bonds representing 45%   collateral footprint has remained constant throughout the
 and 44% of reported collateral respectively. Due to the   period.
 way in which collateralisation works around market values   Similarly, as we look in more detail at the breakdown of
 rather than volumes we have in the past seen equities as a   government bonds by domicile of issue, we see a familiar
 proportion of the total fall away as underling markets have
 picture.


 Fig 16 – Securities Lending Collateral Held in   Fig 17 - Government Bond Collateral held in
 European Triparty  European Triparty by Domicile of Issuers





 Equities - 45%  Europe - 50%

 Corporate Bonds - 10%  Asia - 31%
 Government Bonds - 44%  North America - 12%
             Not unexpectedly European government bonds dominate   Any move away from a title transfer environment to one
 Other - 1%  Other - 7%  the collateral pool representing some 50% of all the circa   where collateral is simply held by a triparty agent under a
             €900 billion of government bonds held across the triparty   security interest raises important questions for our markets
             system. We have observed before the prevalence of   and wider stakeholders. For example, and although we
             Asian government bonds being used by borrowers and   have advocated for some time that most if not all collateral
             again JGB’s represent nearly a third of the government   received by lenders is simply held as a mitigant against loss
             bond collateral portfolio. Again, this highlights how our   the adoption of a pledge collateral model would essentially
             markets can reflect global diversity within specific regional   rule out any reuse and has implications for any wider
             or local settings. Finally, it is worth noting how little US   discussions around collateral velocity.
             governments bonds appear to be used as collateral.   Consequently, we have for some time been trying to get
             Notwithstanding the fact that they represent over 30% of   closer to understanding to what extent our market has
             all securities on-loan at the 30th June they make up only   been adopting pledge collateral and what the direction of
             12% of the government bond collateral. Whilst the reasons   travel looks like. After working with our partners within
             for this may be varied it is perhaps likely that using other   the triparty community we have for the first time begun
             eligible securities such as JGB’s is more efficient from a   to see some colour around these statistics. Initial data
             cost perspective. It is also probable that US Treasuries   provided this quarter suggests that between 10% and
             command a higher premium as they may be used to   15% of all business is now being conducted under pledge
             support a range of transactions across global securities and   arrangements.
             repo markets.
                                                              Separately and discussed in more detail elsewhere in
             In 2018 as part of its commitment to support the use   this report we have also begun to see information flows
             of global master agreements for the securities lending   coming out from the Trade Repositories in respect of SFTR
             industry, ISLA published a pledge collateral version of   data which includes some details of the legal form of the
             our existing Global Master Securities Lending Agreement   transactions being submitted by market participants. Initial
             (GMSLA). This provided an alternative to our traditional   analysis suggest we are seeing similar levels of pledge
             title transfer master agreements and allowed market   collateral business being reported here as well
             participants to look at concluding agreements with
             counterparts in jurisdictions where legal set-off in the   We know that many firms are looking at pledge collateral
             event of default was not certain as well as looking at   as a priority for their business models into the remainder
             alternative ways to potentially manage residual RWA   of this year and 2022 and we will of course monitor
             charges associated with over collateralization within title   developments in this area with great interest over the
             transfer legal frameworks.                       coming months.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34